CO129-154 - Public Offices - 1871 — Page 92

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

Houst

of Commen

Admira

Agent

Cou

We

arry

art

therefore unable to pronoun

opinion whether the Chief Justice warranted in point of forron declaring the second arrest

but

twe

that

ce

is ti be illegal, His prisoners should be disposed

to

Jay if the parties were arrested for pircicy after their discharge from their previous arrest, which had been made upon the application of the Chimèse authorities for their extradition,

the second arrest was made alis inthith, and they ought not to have been discharged by the Chief Justice, nor was the Attorney General tiable to penalties under 31 Car. C.2. J. £1. We have already reported

Your Lordship that the opinion of the

Officers

Jeni

to

in 1852, which is to be

found in the Furzythi's Bowok p. 22.9

us

to to be correct.

appears, The furisdiction of a

regards British Colonial

Court to try

and

A...

91

question of murder

we may add of trespass, Commmitted by foreigners

a vessel

a

beard

on the High Leas under

foreign flag, but your Lordship will find

in the same volmne p.

114 the opinion of Mr Justice Blacklum cited

Re Ternan 33 Law

1

Journal (M. Off. P. 211, that when the crime consists in having over- powered the ship" (which in that an American Thip) it a crime within the piris_

Care

was

becomes a

diction of every civilised nation We consider that the Luforeme Court of Hong Kong has purisdiction under 127 13 Vict. CXXI to by any party within its jurisdiction for piracy under the Law

of Nations, we think it right also to add.

actions which may

that

any

lie

brought against the Attorney General

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.